
![]() |
|||||||||||||
WJPR Citation
|
| All | Since 2020 | |
| Citation | 8502 | 4519 |
| h-index | 30 | 23 |
| i10-index | 227 | 96 |
COSMETOVIGILANCE: A SURVEY AMONG FEMALE EMPLOYEES AND TESTING OF HEAVY METALS IN COSMETICS
Aditi A. Lahodkar*, Agrasen G. Moon and Shrutik M. Munjewar
. Abstract Although it is considered that cosmetics do not have adverse effects, studies have revealed that a significant number of consumers experience adverse reactions. Undesirable effects arising from the use of cosmetic products have created the need for a reporting and evaluation, which is responsible for some restrictions on the use of cosmetics components, called cosmetovigilance. However, the new cosmetovigilance concept needs some updates to become more effective for public health. For instance, adverse effects related to cosmetic use have been reported more frequently recently, but this rate is still quite low. These adverse reactions like contact dermatitis, acne pimples, pigmentation, rashes, might be the cause of presence of heavy metals in cosmetic products. Heavy metals contamination in cosmetic products is a serious threat. Present study was conducted to evaluate the concentrations of heavy metals in various brands of cosmetic products with special emphasis on their health risk assessment. Presence of five heavy metals including mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium and nickel were identified in different brands of lotions, foundations, whitening creams, lipsticks, kajal, mascara and antiaging creams using qualitative analysis method i.e. limit test. Keywords: Cosmetovigilance, Limit test, Heavy metals. [Full Text Article] [Download Certificate] |
